Oberon (Metatron, Aumscan, Biospect and Similar) vs. BioCoherence
Oberon (Metatron) and BioCoherence comparison
Short History & Founder
• The Oberon system (also known under many commercial names like Metatron, Aumscan, Biospect, Physioscan...) has roots in the 1960s, developed initially by Nikolai Goncharov and Dr. Alexey Danilychev, including its expansion as a commercial bioresonance tool in the 2000s, dating back to the pioneering work in electrodiagnostics and frequency medicine in the 1960s. Oberon was designed as a bioresonance diagnostic tool that combines frequency analysis and multidimensional diagnostics. It uses bioelectrical signals from the body for therapeutic purposes.
• BioCoherence is a biometric analysis platform that computes 1400 biomarkers from an ECG recording, integrating energy, body, and mind health metrics.
Key Technical Points
Feature | BioCoherence | Oberon (Metatron and Similar) |
|---|---|---|
Main Focus | Holistic health analysis (energy, body, mind) | Bioresonance and frequency analysis for therapeutic purposes |
Core Technology | ECG-based biometric computation | Bioresonance diagnostic and therapeutic frequency modulation |
ECG Recording Duration | 2 minutes | No direct ECG recording; uses bioelectrical signals with electrodes or skin sensors. |
Number of Biomarkers | 1400+ | Not explicitly defined, based on bioresonance diagnostics |
Computational Approach | All values computed from ECG | Frequency analysis and resonance feedback |
Visualization | 40+ screens (graphs, body maps, flower diagrams) | Graphical interface for resonance patterns and frequency diagnostics |
Audio Integration | Frequency-based biomarker support & personalized meditation (adapts daily for 21 days) | Uses frequencies to influence the body's energetic field, but no personalized meditation |
Mind & Energy Analysis | Yes (Chakras, Ayurvedic energy, brainwaves, emotions, focus, 16 personality types, etc.) | Limited mind and energy focus, primarily bioresonance therapy |
Body Analysis | Yes (TCM meridians, acupuncture points, organ maps) | Body analysis through energetic feedback but lacks direct biomarker mapping |
Multi-Platform Support | Yes (Smartphones, Tablets, Mac, PC, Linux) | No (Standalone medical devices only) |
AI Integration | AI Helpers for biomarker interpretation and user guidance | No AI integration |
Medical Certification | ECG device is medically certified (algorithms pending medical recognition, with studies planned) | Alternative wellness device in Russia for bioresonance therapy (but widely used in clinics) |
Similarities
• Both focus on holistic health and energetic balance.
• Both aim to improve well-being through frequency-based diagnostics.
Differences
Technical
• Oberon (Metatron) uses bioresonance and biofeedback techniques, including frequency modulation to influence the body's energetic state, while BioCoherence is primarily focused on ECG-derived biomarkers and their holistic health implications.
• BioCoherence computes 1400 biomarkers, offering a detailed and precise health profile, while Oberon provides bioresonance readings but lacks detailed biomarker analysis.
User Experience
• Oberon relies on frequency-based therapeutic interventions with no direct ECG readings, while BioCoherenceprovides a more detailed, medically-oriented approach based on ECG data.
• Oberon is a standalone medical device, while BioCoherence works on smartphones, tablets, and computers (Mac, PC, Linux).
Conclusion
• Oberon (Metatron) is focused on bioresonance and energetic therapy, while BioCoherence offers a detailed ECG-based analysis of biomarkers across energy, body, and mind health. Systems costs range from 10.000 to 40.000 USD.
• BioCoherence provides more technical, medical-grade analysis, with multi-platform support and AI guidance, compared to Oberon's focus on energetic therapy. Professional systems costs range from 100 USD/month to 10,000 USD.